Scandal Puts Pressure on a Brazilian Leader to Step Down

Fernando Bizerra, Jr./European Pressphoto Agency

José Sarney, the president of Brazil’s Senate, in the capital on Monday. He faces growing pressure to resign amid a scandal.

from "The New York Times"

By ALEXEI BARRIONUEVO Published: August 6, 2009


BRASÍLIA — The leader of Brazil’s Senate is under heavy pressure to step down amid a nepotism and corruption scandal that threatens to hamstring the government of President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva during his final year in office.

The Senate leader, José Sarney, is a former Brazilian president who both supported the military dictatorship and led the nation during its transition to civilian democracy. Now he is considered an important ally for Mr. da Silva, who has plans to pass contentious legislation affecting the oil industry and also pick a candidate to succeed him in next year’s presidential elections.

But Mr. Sarney has been the subject of news reports here saying he abused his status as a senator by giving jobs and favors to friends and family members. The accusations include unduly allowing his grandson to benefit from government contracts, holding an illegal bank account outside of Brazil and allowing a foundation carrying his name to end up with roughly $250,000 in grant money from the state-run oil company, Petrobras.

Mr. Sarney, 79, has refused to resign, denouncing the accusations as false or exaggerated. He has also acted mildly surprised about concerns of nepotism and patronage, saying his conduct was not unusual for a senator.

“I did not favor a grandson or granddaughter,” he said on the Senate floor on Wednesday, his hand trembling as he held a prepared statement. “I am the victim of a systematic and aggressive campaign.”

The accusations against Mr. Sarney have embroiled the Senate in yet another pitched battle over the fate of its leadership. Two years ago, Renan Calheiros, a member of Mr. Sarney’s Brazilian Democratic Movement Party, gave up the post of Senate president after facing a disciplinary inquiry by the Senate Ethics Committee related to income tax fraud and the questionable purchase of a stake in a radio station.

The latest debacle comes at a difficult moment for Mr. da Silva, who has endured scandals in his own Workers’ Party that forced top officials to resign. Despite his high popularity personally, Mr. da Silva relies on an alliance with the Democratic Movement Party to form the government’s slim majority in the Senate.

The Brazilian government is preparing a proposal that would give the national oil company unprecedented control over the development of huge deepwater oil fields that could transform Brazil into a global oil power, according to one person with knowledge of the proposed law. And the president is seeking congressional support for the candidacy of Dilma Rousseff, his chief of staff, whom he chose to succeed him in the 2010 elections.

The debacle could also complicate the Senate’s investigation into possible improprieties at the national oil company, an inquiry that could last up to 180 days. Mr. da Silva was hoping to keep the investigation under control through government allies on the investigative committee. But with the Senate in disarray and amid allegations involving both Mr. Sarney and the oil company, the inquiry “may become a bit less predictable,” said Erasto Almeida, an analyst at Eurasia Group, a political risk consultancy.

The Senate conflict “is paralyzing Congress,” said Alexandre Barros, a political risk analyst here. “It is very difficult to get a big law voted on with all of this going on.”

In many ways, Mr. Sarney, who took over as the Senate president in February, is the last of a generation of politicians who operated under an older system of machine politics in which so-called colonels from powerful families like the Sarneys dispensed favors for loyalty, analysts say. The system allowed agrarian oligarchs to dominate local politics, especially in Brazil’s rural and impoverished north and northeast.

Mr. Sarney and his daughter Roseana served in the Senate together and are former governors of Maranhão, where the Sarney family has vast land holdings and a media conglomerate that controls one of the area’s most important television stations. This year, his daughter became Maranhão’s governor again.

“We are living the last moments of a political culture that he represented,” said Tasso Jereissati, a senator from the opposition Social Democratic Party, who said Mr. Sarney should resign. “All of this is being demolished now.”

Some senators have aggressively defended Mr. Sarney. At a heated session on Monday, Fernando Collor de Mello, a former president who was forced to resign over influence-peddling but is now a senator, threatened to expose corruption involving other senators if they did not back down from criticizing Mr. Sarney.

“They have made Sarney into a monster,” said Romero Jucá, a senator in Mr. Sarney’s party. “He is not a monster.”

Mr. da Silva has walked a tightrope in recent days, coming to the defense of Mr. Sarney and pressing senators in the Workers’ Party to back him, while distancing himself from any responsibility for Senate ethics.

Late Wednesday, the Senate Ethics Committee voted to table 4 of the 11 allegations against Mr. Sarney.

A strong supporter of the 1964 military coup, Mr. Sarney was the governor of Maranhão in the late 1960s and then became the vice president in 1985 during Brazil’s transition to democracy. After President-elect Tancredo Neves became fatally ill, Mr. Sarney was sworn in as president, serving until 1990. As his term progressed, he became deeply unpopular during a period of rampant inflation. Since then, he has been a senator, also holding the chamber’s president post from 2003 to 2005.

Mery Galanternick contributed reporting from Rio de Janeiro.


Duque deve anunciar decisão de arquivar mais sete pedidos de investigação contra Sarney no Conselho de Ética do Senado

Publicada em 07/08/2009 às 13h31m

O Globo

BRASÍLIA - O presidente do Conselho de Ética, Paulo Duque (PMDB-RJ), deve anunciar nesta sexta-feira sua decisão de arquivar mais sete pedidos de investigação contra o presidente do Senado, José Sarney (PMDB-AP). São quatro representações do PSDB e PSOL e três denúncias assinadas pelo líder do PSDB, Arthur Virgilio (AM), e pelo senador Cristovam Buarque (PDT-DF). A oposição deverá recorrer da decisão.

Todas sobre o envolvimento de Sarney em atos de nepotismo, ligação com a fundação que leva seu nome, suspeita de desvio de recursos da Petrobras e uso de atos secretos para nomear o namorado da neta Maria Beatriz. Duque, que na quarta-feira arquivou os quatro primeiros pedidos de investigação, diz não temer a rejeição das ruas:

" Não temo. Já até marquei com minha família onde vou almoçar no dia dos pais. Não temo nada "

O presidente do Conselho disse que os despachos vão direto para a publicação sem passar pelo debate no Conselho, e têm que ter o mesmo dos anteriores, ou seja o arquivo, para ser coerente:

- O bom ladrão salva-se, mas não há salvação para o mau juiz. O juiz covarde não tem salvação - disse Duque.

O suplente de suplente pelo PMDB diz que não se julga impedido de julgar a representação encaminhada por seu partido contra Arthur Virgilio. E nega que esteja a serviço da tropa de choque liderada pelo seu líder Renan Calheiros (PMDB-AL).

- Eu decidi tudo sozinho. Adoro decidir sozinho - jurou.

Tasso diz que recursos contra arquivamento só passam se PT apoiar

A avaliação dos senadores que se articulam para tentar derrubar o arquivamento das investigações contra Sarney, é que o recurso só tem chance de ser aprovado no Conselho de Ética se a liderança do PT liberar seus representantes para votar a favor da continuidade das representações.

- Tudo está nas mãos do PT para aprovar os recursos primeiro no Conselho, e depois, se for o caso, no plenário da Casa. A ação da tropa de choque passou dos limites. Se o PT pelo menos liberar a bancada, temos chance, porque mais da metade concorda com a licença e investigação - afirmou o senador Tasso Jereissati (PSDB-CE).

Para aprovar o recurso e permitir a abertura do processo de investigação contra Sarney é preciso que pelo menos oito senadores votem a favor no plenário do Conselho. Até agora DEM, PDT e PSDB têm seis votos. Seriam necessários pelo menos dois votos favoráveis dos três representantes do PT: Ideli Salvati (SC), João Pedro (AM) e Delcídio Amaral (MS).

Comentários

Postagens mais visitadas